strange behaviors

Cool doings from the natural and human worlds

  • Richard Conniff

  • Reviews for Richard Conniff’s Books

    Every Creeping Thing: True Tales of Faintly Repulsive Wildlife: “Conniff is a splendid writer–fresh, clear, uncondescending, and with never a false step; one can’t resist quoting him.” (NY Times Book Review)

    The Species Seekers:  Heroes, Fools, and the Mad Pursuit of Life on Earth by Richard Conniff is “a swashbuckling romp” that “brilliantly evokes that just-before Darwin era” (BBC Focus) and “an enduring story bursting at the seams with intriguing, fantastical and disturbing anecdotes” (New Scientist). “This beautifully written book has the verve of an adventure story” (Wall St. Journal)

    Swimming with Piranhas at Feeding Time by Richard Conniff  is “Hilariously informative…This book will remind you why you always wanted to be a naturalist.” (Outside magazine) “Field naturalist Conniff’s animal adventures … are so amusing and full color that they burst right off the page …  a quick and intensely pleasurable read.” (Seed magazine) “Conniff’s poetic accounts of giraffes drifting past like sail boats, and his feeble attempts to educate Vervet monkeys on the wonders of tissue paper will leave your heart and sides aching.  An excellent read.” (BBC Focus magazine)

  • Wall of the Dead

  • Categories

Save the Shipwrecks to Save the Fish (and the Fishing)

Posted by Richard Conniff on August 8, 2015

(Photo: Reinhard Dirscherl/ullstein bild via Getty Images)

(Photo: Reinhard Dirscherl/ullstein bild via Getty Images)


A few years ago in the Black Sea, off the Turkish coast, a marine archaeology expedition discovered a 2,400-year-old wooden shipwreck. It was still in good condition because of low-oxygen levels at its resting depth, and a video revealed human bones and vase-like clay storage vessels, called amphora, still intact. But when the crew returned to investigate the following year, fishing nets dragged across the bottom had reduced the entire wreck to scattered rubble. It was, said one archaeologist, like somebody drove a bulldozer through a museum.

The same thing has happened to roughly 45 percent of the estimated 3 million shipwrecks in the world’s lakes and oceans because of the industrial-scale trawling that has also decimated fish stocks worldwide.

But in a new study being published in the journal Marine Policy, an archaeologist and an ecologist propose a solution they say will protect these underwater cultural artifacts and at the same time boost fish populations and improve commercial fisheries.

The key insight came one day when Jason S. Krumholz, an ecologist with the National Marine Fisheries Service, was sitting with his five-year-old son watching videos taken by a remotely operated vehicle visiting shipwrecks in the Mediterranean. “We started to notice that some of these wrecks have a ton of fish, and some have almost none,” Krumholz recalled.


How bottom trawling works (Illustration: Ferdinand Oberle)

That led him and Michael Brennan, a University of Rhode Island oceanographer who had participated in that expedition off the Turkish coast, to ask what makes the difference. For their new study, they looked at videos from 18 ancient shipwrecks and found that “shipwrecks in areas historically excluded from fishing are in better condition and support larger and more diverse fish communities than wrecks which have been damaged by trawling.”

Moreover, they argue that those shipwrecks, protected by steep terrain, underwater cables, rocky waters, or other circumstances, become breeding grounds for commercially valuable fish, and that these populations “spill over” to increase the haul for commercial fishing outside the protected area. And that suggested a strategy to benefit archaeologists and fishermen alike by siting Marine Protected Areas, where fishing is outlawed, around sites that are already rich with shipwrecks.

The idea of Marine Protected Areas is, of course, not new. But they have become increasingly popular with conservationists and the fishing industry alike because experience has shown that they work. In one recent study, properly planned and managed MPAs had five times the tonnage of large fish and 14 times the shark biomass compared with fished areas. Siting new MPAs around areas with extensive shipwrecks is simply a way to make them more effective, according to Krumholz and Brennan.

Krumholz explained how these MPAs work by analogy with lobster fishing in Maine. Regulations there strictly limit the take to lobsters with a carapace length from 3.25 to 5 inches. That protects “all lobsters until they’ve had a chance to breed at least once” and also the lucky few that manage to elude the fishery long enough to outgrow it.  Big, old lobsters make many more eggs than younger ones—up to 100,000 per year, versus 5,000 or 10,000 for the youngsters. They can also keep restocking the lobster fishery for a life span up to 100 years.

The higher reproductive output by older individuals is true for most fish species, said Krumholz. But while the commercial fishers can protect younger and smaller fish by adjusting the size of the mesh on nets, they can’t avoid killing the big ones: Any fish that gets caught in a trawl net is a dead one. Instead, MPAs around shipwrecks could be a logical counterpart to the upper limit on the lobster catch: They’d provide a refuge where big, old breeders could continue pumping out eggs in peace.

MPAs are becoming a practical tool because most fishing boats now use global positioning software that can clearly indicate the borders of an off-limits area. “Very few fishermen cheat,” said Krumholz. “They know the MPAs are there for their own benefit, and they’re pretty good at participating in the process to site MPAs and then observing those rules.”

A few MPAs sited on shipwrecks already exist, notably Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary in Michigan’s Lake Huron and the Monitor National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of Virginia. It’s also a common strategy to support fisheries, said Krumholz, by “spending a lot of money sinking ships and dumping airplanes to build up artificial reefs.”

The new study asks, in effect, why not take better advantage of the shipwrecks that are already there?

3 Responses to “Save the Shipwrecks to Save the Fish (and the Fishing)”

  1. […] found in the water at Rio Olympics site (KPCs. Disturbing on many levels) Trolling economists Save the Shipwrecks to Save the Fish (and the Fishing) The backlash to the backlash against p-values (my thoughts on p-values here) The Curious Case of […]

  2. Reblogged this on GarryRogers Nature Conservation and Science Fiction (#EcoSciFi) and commented:
    Wildlife benefits from many of the objects abandoned by humans. Old mines provide homes for Ringtail troops, and an old sofa serves as a packrat palace. We’ve taken away so much of the natural habitat that animals need, it is ironic that cleaning up after ourselves can cause further harm.

  3. I am a little agog at this update: 94 percent of all so-called Marine Protected Areas allow some fishing. Read the new study here:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s