strange behaviors

Cool doings from the natural and human worlds

  • Richard Conniff writes about behavior, in humans and other animals, on two, four, six, and eight legs, plus the occasional slither.

  • Categories

  • Wall of the Dead

What a Lovely World of Liars and Frauds

Posted by Richard Conniff on June 18, 2016

Butterfies disguised as dead leaves inspired Alfred Russel Wallace’s work on evolutionary theory. (Photo: James Laing/Flickr)

Butterfies disguised as dead leaves held inspire Alfred Russel Wallace’s work on natural selection. (Photo: James Laing/Flickr)

by Richard Conniff/The Wall Street Journal

The notion that anything natural must be wholesome and good is, to be honest, idiotic. Polygamy is a natural behavior for some species. Infanticide is natural. Turning your mate into a post-coital snack is not only natural, it’s a strategy for reproductive success.

cheats-300x434We are not those species, fortunately, and “Cheats and Deceits” is not a how-to book for humans. The subtitle is “How Animals and Plants Exploit and Mislead.” Martin Stevens is an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Exeter and also a sensory ecologist. He studies disguise and deception as they appear not just to us but to other species, which may rely on chemical signals we can’t perceive or visual signals we can’t see. For instance: Soon after hatching, the caterpillar of the alcon blue butterfly drops to the ground, where one might expect it to be attacked and eaten by foraging ants. But this caterpillar instead gets carried back to the ants’ nest and fed as an honored guest.

This very hungry caterpillar is a fraud: It emits chemicals closely resembling the ones that serve local ants as a means of recognizing nestmates. (Just to be sure, the researchers who demonstrated this applied caterpillar chemicals to tiny glass dummies, and the ants also treated them as newfound friends.) Once inside the nest, the caterpillar adjusts its chemical signal to match the particular ant colony more precisely and ensure continued feeding.

It wants to be very well fed, in fact. So the caterpillar quickly starts mimicking the sounds and vibrations with which the queen of the ant colony communicates her special status. When the caterpillar has finally gotten enough food to pupate and emerge into its adult butterfly form, it does a run for the door. The ants, realizing that they’ve been duped, make a grab for the fleeing intruder but generally come away with nothing more than the scales loosely attached to its body.

The natural world is full of such sophisticated con games, as Mr. Stevens abundantly demonstrates. On Indo-Pacific coral reefs, for instance, certain species, called “cleaner fish,” set up a sort of carwash for other fish species, which duly line up to have the parasites picked off their flanks. No tipping required: For the cleaner fish, the parasites make a meal. But the bluestriped fangblenny is after bigger game. It mimics the appearance of innocent cleaner fish, and when an unsuspecting customer swims up, it darts forward and rips off a chunk of its flesh.

This is naturally bad for business at the carwash, so the fangblennies succeed in part because they are relatively rare. You might think the cleaner fish would do their best to weed out even the occasional imposter, but the fangblennies make this challenging. Their bodies contain chromatophores that “act like packets of pigment,” allowing the fangblennies to switch their mimicry on or off or adjust it to better match the neighbors.

Deception is more than just a curious aspect of animal behavior. Camouflage—particularly the way certain butterfly species disguise themselves as dead leaves—was one of the things that led Alfred Russel Wallace to formulate his ideas about the origin of species, leading to the joint publication by Darwin and Wallace of their theory of evolution by natural selection.

Camouflage, and the case of the peppered moth, also provided the first evidence of evolutionary change observable on a human time scale. As industrial pollution became widespread in mid-19th-century England, the lighter form of these moths, suited to hiding itself against pale or lichen-covered tree trunks, became less common. A darker form, better disguised against soot-blackened trees, proliferated. Then, as antipollution laws went into effect in the mid-20th-century, the pattern began to reverse. Either way, natural selection was a result of hungry birds picking off the less camouflaged form. Creationists have criticized the peppered-moth story as an evolutionary myth. But extensive scientific research has recently vindicated the particulars in painstaking detail. (A study published this month in the journal Nature identified the precise genetic mutation that caused the original color change and dated it to about 1819.)

Mr. Stevens writes as a scientist and does not aim to be particularly colorful or entertaining. But the behaviors he describes take care of that by themselves, and Mr. Stevens makes for a clear, thoughtful, jargon-free guide. He provides plenty of examples to parse out the many varieties of deception, from “sensory exploitation” to “aggressive mimicry” and “motion dazzle.” The book is especially helpful in explaining the details of how scientists over recent decades have refined our understanding of old theories using modern devices “to measure the colours, smells or sounds of animals and to understand and model how animals perceive the world.”

I knew, for instance, about female bolas spiders, which mimic the sex pheromone of certain female moths to attract male moths. Then, when a moth comes in range, the spider flings a sticky ball on a string and hauls it in for dinner. But I didn’t know about recent research on one kind of bolas spider that starts its night’s work by emitting the seductive scent of a moth species common around 10:30 p.m., then shifts to the scent of another species that turns up around 11. It’s a sort of utility femme fatale.

Nor was I aware of recent evidence that leaf mimics have been evolving for at least 126 million years, or that marine brachiopods may have disguised themselves as unpalatable sponges more than 500 million years ago. These delicious, duplicitous details make exploring the natural world seem all the more fascinating. If you want to understand just how thoroughly we live in a realm of intrigue and deception, this book is a fine place to begin.

One Response to “What a Lovely World of Liars and Frauds”

  1. UPDATE June 27 2016 A new study looks at insects trapped in amber and finds abundant evidence that they were using camouflage 100 million years ago:

    “These are very rare fossils, which give us unique insights into life more than 100 million years ago,” says Dr. Torsten Wappler of the Steinmann-Institute of the University of Bonn, who joined Dr. Wang and Professor Rust to classify these oldest examples of camouflage. The research team was astonished to see the broad range of camouflage already used by insects in the Cretaceous.

    Some larvae fashioned a kind of “knight’s armor” from grains of sand, perhaps to protect against spider bites. In order to custom-tailor their “camo,” they have even adapted their limbs for the purpose. The larvae were able to turn their legs about 180 degrees, in order to transport the grains of sand onto their back. Others cloaked themselves in plant residue, in order to become one with their surroundings, making them almost undetectable to predators. “It is very surprising how early in evolution such complex insect behavior developed: The larvae had to search actively for suitable ‘camouflage material’, pick it up, and cloak themselves with it,” says Dr. Wang, who, with a stipend from the Humboldt-Stiftung foundation, has been a guest at the University of Bonn several times doing research.

    Read the press release here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160624154710.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fplants_animals+%28Plants+%26+Animals+News+–+ScienceDaily%29

    Read the study in Science Advances here: http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/6/e1501918

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s